web analytics

Posts Tagged ‘california’

Pest Control Board California

Written by admin on . Posted in Pest Control

pest control board california
pest control board california

KASHMIR CENTRIC FOOD SECURITY VISION

 

KASHMIR CENTRIC FOOD SECURITY VISION

1, THE CROPPING SCENARIO

By prof DR GHULAM MOHYUDDIN WANI

This series of our articles shall be Jammu and Kashmir agricultural development  centric. It may have repetition in some or the other  of our articles in this and other websites.It  is designed for the Jammu and kashmir state but may have relevence for the whole world too,espacilly similar ecosystems.

INTRODUCTION

  • Higher productivity gains can be achieved through application of technology and production recommendations at farmer’s field. We have 65% small and marginal farmers whose awareness potential is low. The production system prevailing with these farmers is a mixed farming or composite farming. In contrast to USA and European agriculture our necessity is to increase “Crop opportunities” RATHER than COMODITY production gains.

MIXED FARMING MODULES ARE OUR NEED

      A mixed Agriculture University and Education set ups is our necessity. We are at present going astray to our need. Quick and fast measures are needed to unify our educational system, involving all agriculture and allied disciplines, industries, corporate sectors and farmers’ institutions.

GREEN REVOLUTION DAYS

It is worth mentioning that Indian Agricultural pride years of green revolution post 1968 saw reduction in food gain imports and subsequently white, blue and other revolutions sustained our population pressures and agriculture growth. Our agricultural growth rate needs to be equal if not more to population growth rate (PGR). Our AGR target ought to be double the PGR. This is important as consumption rates, purchasing power and employment /income prospects increase.

FOOD GRAIN SECURITY

 An estimated food grain of 210 million tons at present may need to be doubled in next 10 years. We have to achieve higher targets of productivity by vertical expansion as horizontal land expansion is not possible. our  target of 4 t/h of rice or wheat shall make Jammu and kashmir self sufficient ,a food security base shall need 5t/h.On an average we have 2-3 t/h rice and marginally less wheat production in the state. Combining vegetables ,fruits and other pulses we may be comparatively better off in the future. The per capita food grain consumption is marginally more than rest of the Indian state because of severe cold and more calorie  are needed.

EXPERIEMENTAL YIELDS

 Under our experimental stages and even under experimental trails of miniskirts our overall productivity in rice ranges between 5-6t/h, wheat 3-4 t/h, maize 3-5 t /h .The experimental peak yield of 8-10 t /h with some varieties was reported.The  other details have been reported Wani, 2007.and is available on this website too. The increase in yield  of paddy , from 1947 to 2009 have been amassing from 40-50 kegs a kanal (i/8th of an acre and measure of land in J& K )to round 350 to400 kgs a kanal.This achievement has been possible under assured irrigation systems with use of both biological, organic and chemical fertilizers. Organic experiments made under our supervision in an IVLP project showed higher production of 2 q per hectare with change of a wooden plough to an iron plough called as Shalimar plough.The use of manure both farm yard and green have reduced the chemical fertilizer use and increased productivity.Due to less than 1/10th of fertilizer use than recommended or that used in Punjab we are better off in JAMMU AND KASHMIR specially at terminal ends in the mountainous regions.We can directly swithch to the organic farming of all dry fruits and vegetables forth with,

COMMERCIAL CROPS

Commercial crops like mushroom,honey,flouriculture,dairy farming  poultry and sheep for meat production  have an tremendous potential for the development.The aquatic and forest vegetable along with naturally growm medicinal bushes and herbs have a trememdous market and economic viability.The bee keeping as polinizers and even around dal ,wular and other lakes have a tremendous potential of producing iodine rich honey which can fetch exorbant prices in the world market and can be used by the thyroid deficiency and gout patients.

DISEASE RESISTANT LOCAL GENOTYPE

A varieties of loca vegetables which grow of their own on the denuded forest and other bunds and nomams kand called nunar is rich in iron.Many other self growm weeds use as best and nutririve vegetables can be the best soil binders and providers of organic,rainfed vegetative cover to the denuded and eroded lands besides livestitritive cock fodder and human and poor nutritive support for the nomaids and the tribials.There are a number of the local genotype which grow of their own in our dry ,wet and marshy lands .A sequential DNA Mappling is needed to know their potential and nutritive value.There cultivation and propagation shall give a ready made organic .sustianable and low input base and food security.The mapping shall reveal their properties and one can plan and propagate them,One such model for the fine cashmere bearing goats was run by the author with fruitful results for the whole pashmina industry,This attempt referred saved our valuable gene pool,This gene pool was other wise being diluted with Russian and Mongolian bred DON goats.The cross breeding was stopped by the author and thus preserved the gene pool of our low yielder but fine diameter giats from cross breeding.Similar attempts to conserve and preserve the local vegetable,rice,ffruit and nut mfishmanimal gene pools are to be preserved and improved through biotechnological use.

Seed multiplication

 We have developed many disease resistant and high yielding varieties, in paddy at rice research centre at Khodwani.The seed multiplication is slow and needs a proper state-central, icar-skuast convergence, which has not been forthcoming for problems at apex level.A policy decision has to be made to utilize the available agricultural and allied graduate to raise private-public partnership mode seed banks.We need 10,000 quintals of paddy seed alone per annum.We utilized all the land available under our KVK system but were hardly able to produce a few hundred quintals of the paddy seed.The private –public association and partnership too resulted in marginal than a substantial increase.The only solution to provide the seed farming land is the flood channels available for two among three years,The SRI IS A PROPOSITION yet to be tried in the state.Alternatively let us use these flood channels and utilize the unemployed graduate to harness seed farming revolutions in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.The only risk of flood is once in five years which can be sustained by the profits or the insurance cover available for such ventures.A sectional judicious planning can even avert these risks too.

NATIONAL LEVEL PLANNING

. Likewise production of 100 million tonnes of wheat from 25 million hectares needs a productivity of 4t/hac.Jammu and Kashmir is 1/100 th of the country, Thus we need one million ton of wheat and rice each to feed our one crore population. Our population growth is slower than the rest of the states .purchasing power is better than the average farmer or the person in India. We our aim to double our per hectare productivity needs more technical manpower in extension, industry and at gross root level. The climate disasters, earthquakes, Titanic tsunami, floods; have affected our agricultural production in the past and additional requirements needs to be kept in mind while planning food security. We need to increase per capita consumption expenditures of Rs. 600 per month. We need to bridge the gaps between potential and actual yields at farmers’ level. The chemical farming hazards of poor soil fertility, low water availability, pollution and environmental concerns impede our agricultural development. Thus refined technology, participatory research and educational modules are needed. The new pressures of global marketing. World trade and tariff regulations have to be accommodated. This all will need incorporation of new themes like post-harvest management, value addition, packaging, communication, and credit and market information services in our course curricula. Thus a new multidimensional change in academic curriculum is envisaged.  

“We feel pride in calling ourselves as the 2nd largest Agricultural Research System (ARS) in the world. When we review our performance, we are nowhere in top ten of most cited agriculture publications in the world. The USA tops the world list with 3, 62, 79,842 cited publication/annum, with small country like Switzerland at No.10. The scientific output in agriculture is highest in USA with 27 lakh publication/year followed by Japan, Germany, U.K, France, Canada, Italy, Russia, China and Australia. Our contribution to Agriculture publication is 5.48% only with our share of  citation at 2.32%. This demands more focus on Quality Assurance. Our prime agenda should be quality, Accreditation, Desired Knowledge, Assessment, Skill and competence building and academic audit. Quality assurance means strengthening resources, information and maintenance of educational infrastructure. Thus we need to regulate grants and Centre-State relations rationally,” said a group of experts associated with the author of this report.

ICAR GRANT SYSTEM

We have Central Agricultural Universities and 200 general Universities, with 48 agricultural faculties. The total disciplines needing grants may be strengthened in 5 yrs by 1core grants to each discipline for quality assurance. We produce 10,000 under graduate, 5500 post graduates and 1600 Ph.D. in agriculture every years. They add to our unemployment pool. For making them self-employees in new ventures and for increased employment, they need competence building in global economics and trade policies. Biotechnology, Bio information, Bio fertilizers, Pesticides and Fungicides. New faculty development in all the Universities and colleges is to be executed in coming 5 years. Such as  Pest information and survey; management Analysis; decision support system and Geographic information system. A new trust is to be given to course curriculum integrating field practices in a partnership mode with farmer. A teacher-student-farmer-industry, interaction and co-operation is to be integrated, unified and fine-tuned to end results. This will demand inter and inter faculty harmony and synchronized course curricula at UG, PG and PhD level. This has to be fine-tuned to our field requirements and location orient Agricultural extension is evolving worldwide and there is much emphasis today on community-based mechanisms of dissemination in order to bring sustainable change. The factors that make farmer groups successful in disseminating INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGIES NEED DETAILED analysis. A mixed methodology, multiple-stage approach stands used to obtain data.

 

 

 

KASHMIR CENTRIC FOOD SECURITY VISION

SERIES 2
THE TECHNOLOGY BASED FARMING

BY PROF GHULAM MOHYUDDIN WANI
Moreover, we have to use more technology based cropping system to increase productivity per unit land. Horizontal expansion is not possible. Embargo on indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and other farm-use-agents is another constraint to increase productivity of food grain. Unfortunately our food grain-production pace has declined. Growth rate of 1-2% has put pressures on our economy. Imports of food grains, an anomaly over past decade, needs problem-cause-analysis. The whole system of National Agricultural Research, extension and field functionaries have registered a fatigue. Similarly, the land degradation, mineral depletion and environmental pollution demands new mechanism to boost productivity.
SAMETI
“State Agriculture Management and Extension Training Institute  may help to make adjustments in our farming system so as to integrate agriculture, aquaculture, water conservation and livestock rearing with new technology driven profit earning enterprises. This needs a continued and farmer friendly policies of sustainable agriculture. Technology awareness and application is must to produce more unit of land. We do have a chance as our yields are lower than many countries and even our neighbouring states of India,” said a group of knowledgeable person of Kashmir valley.
ORGANIC FARMING
Organic farming is advocated as modern technology. We left our traditional organic farming for adopting chemical farming, which landed us in trouble. This rotation of modernity and traditionalist taxed us heavily. We perhaps jumped in adopting or testing technologies without comparing them with our own practices. Now reverting back to our own traditional ways is fraught with problems too. The questions often asked are, can we sustain or even maintain our productivity levels by restoring to the organic farming? The Blending of modern technology of today and traditional technology of yester years may answer this question. Can information and communication skills and technology bridge a new union?
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
The present day information and communication technology has trespassed all barriers of race, religion, culture and countries. A Comprehensive study of 23 review papers and a dozen book and journals were presented by the author in 2005. How communication and information can help production and sustain yields stands discussed in detail. Strong warning systems for climate risks, floods and cyclones, pests and mites could help to raise more crops. Farming informatics and awareness packages through print, mass and now E-mails is possible. The role of competitive farming, economic survey and evaluation of farming and women’s integration needs attention. Women, the half of agricultural work force, are still unaware of the technological skills. The barriers of customs, veil, religion and social bondages could be overcome by educating them through TV, cassettes, e-mails or other modern communication appliances.
TECHNOLOGY TRANFER
Technology transfer is easy. We can announce technology practices or even demonstrate them. The key issue is its adoption. India with 25% of its GDP from agriculture spends some 2% of the same on its subsidies rather than on transfer of technology. Blending subsides with agricultural exports will need a drastic cut under new WTO agreements. The global market access opportunity limit of 3% import shall further complicate the issues. The international standards of sanitation shall need more awareness at farmer’s door. Our Agricultural exports from  agricultural items has been up and now we export around 18.45% agricultural good in the shape of apiculture, floriculture, fresh fruits, mushroom, spices, sugar, molasses, rice, tropical fruit juices, pulp, concentrates and even agro-chemicals. Fruit, nuts and vegetables have increased our export earnings. Our limitations in expanding our exports are infrastructure to provide international bio-safe packaging, phyto sanitation & quarantine measures. Our yields too are low to complete with others. Thus, transfer to technology has not to be limited to man methods, publication, leaflets, folders, bulletins, newsletters, journals, magazine, newspaper publication, rural farm broadcasts or television interviews but has to be supplemented with video conferencing, massive awareness campaigns through video cassettes, cable net works and other local farm telecasts. The propaganda, publicity and persuasion has to be supplied with communication skills like rural journalism, popular participation, motivation and more so through management of information systems. The farm visits, farmers calls, letters have to be intensified. Farmers need information on markets, bio standards and marketing research and networking mechanisms.
Apple is an important principal crop of J&K State. The state produced 10414017 MT of apples from 100702 ha of orchard area during year 2005-2006. The state contributes 57% of national production of apples, while as Himachal Pradesh contributes 24% despite having received considerable governmental attention. The state produces early, mid and late season cultivation of apple. The commercial apple varieties are Red Delicious, Golden Delicious, Ambri, White Dotted Red, Royal delicious Kulu Delicious, Hazratbali, Benoni.
POST HARVEST TECHNOLOGY
Post harvest handling of apple encapsulated many management decisions and processes that are involved in harvesting, handling, storage, packing and transport of apple fruit necessary to provide consumer with an acceptable and product. The characteristics of apple which determine its acceptance in market place are size, shape, colour, texture, flavour, juiciness, freedom from blemishes and bruises. A proper export oriented packaging, sanitary evaluation and eco-friendly shall improve its consumer acceptability under WTO regime.

As regards walnut, it may be stated that it is an important nut crop grown in the state of J&K. The state produces 86263 tonnes of walnut from an area of 61723 hectares with the productivity of 1.39 tonnes/ha and has monopoly in the export to many countries of the world. Walnut cultivation is common in Badarwah, Poonch, Kupwara, Baramulla, Bandipora, Ganderbal, Budgam, Srinagar, Anantnag and other hilly areas of J&K. Walnut are consumed as luxury snacks as well as commercially used for preparation of bakery products, chocolates, ice cream, ornaments, oils, confectionery and salad products. Shells are sued in glue and plastics and for making solutions for cleaning and polishing surfaces.

But there are constraints in walnut trade, which need to be addressed.

  • These include awareness of maturity indices, method of harvesting and non-scientific de-hulling. Besides there are post harvest bottlenecks such as improper storage, drying, grading practices at farm level. Lack of awareness about sanitary conditions to handle nuts and lack of integrated handling system to manage the nuts. Non-adoption of international standards of grades and lack of processing/storage facilities/orchard management.

    Pertinent to mention that cherry is another important fruit crop of the valley, which is being marketed outside the state. In Kashmir cherry is the first fruit crop which comes to the market and fetches good prices. The quality of fruit is good in cool climate. Cherries after harvest is to be pre-cooled, stored packed and carried under refrigerated conditions to the terminal market. The fruit transport under refrigerated condition remains healthy for a longer period, compared to the fruits stored under ambient conditions. Storage, packaging, transport and preservation are needed at local level.
    EXPORT OF FRUITS
    For export of horticulture produce, we have to integrate production activities with post harvest management. Infrastructural facilities for Pre-cooling, packaging, grading, processing centers, refrigerated vans, cold storage, cargo handling facility at airport, laboratories for pesticide residue analysis, good road connectivity, market promotion through IT network, credit facility for exporters and awareness programmes are essential prerequisites for export of horticultural produce from the state.

    “Major problems in Horticulture being poor quality planting materials & its inspection mechanization. Low disease diagnostic appliances and poor orchard management. Low capital-small farmer-holdings and poor technological applications. Besides poor post-harvest handling, industrial base and poor quality control measures and laboratories. Marketing network modernization and poor database and electronic use. Hence new options such as germplasm base, analysis, collection of materials across the state are needed. Besides standardization of rootstock for all important crops, development of horticultural cropping systems for all districts and certification and quality control laboratories need attention,” say people connected with horticulture trade.

Horticulture sector

As stated earlier, the major contributor to J&K’s Gross Domestic product is horticulture and horticultural global market share for India is around 15%. We dominate markets in Sri Lanka, Maldives, Nepal and Bangladesh. Our share is relatively less in countries like Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Israel, Kuwait, Pakistan, Oman and Brunei. But with enhancing trade in SAARC countries, we may have more opportunities of expansion in domestic Asian markets. Thus a trust towards horticultural export orientation is linked with peace and union among SAARC countries. We share cultural, religious and food habits, thus our products could be preferred over others. This needs proper post-harvest and market-led extension and outreach system. Given proper attention we may capture markets of Japan, Hong Kong, China and other countries too. For more aggressive development of horticulture in J&K state, there is need to lay stress on the development of marketing facilities, employment and income generation options and setting of export promotion zones.

In order to give boost to exports, thrust needs to be given to strawberry, mushroom and cumin seed, berries, wild fruits and indigenous vegetables. The local horticultural germplasm needs investigative and innovative projections. As local germplasm is well suited to our environment for it needs less water. The new market options for organic fruits produced in J&K need prioritization and certification under WTO regulation. International bio safety measures, grading and packaging of available fruits, initiates for development of new varieties of fruits like kiwi fruit, wild apricot, black cherry, broccoli and mushroom are the suggested ways for the development of this sector. The options for air transport, cargo from Leh, Srinagar and Jammu to centers of consumption like Delhi, Chandigarh and Mumbai need exploration. The agro-based industrial set-ups using low grade apple for juice, shampoo, bio fuels and use of available horticultural and floricultural wastes for marketable commodities as gift packs, scents, ornamentals, dehydrated flowers, perfumes and bio-fuel.

It is reported that Horticulture Planning and Marketing J&K has established Fruit and vegetable markets within the state. The department is in the process of strengthening three main operating markets of Nowpora (Sopore), Parimpora (Srinagar) and Narwal (Jammu). So far multipurpose grading, packing and auction sheds have been constructed at Nowpora Sopore. Further 17 satellite markets have been established within the state. Market information service has been introduced to collect and disseminate market intelligence through NET connectivity within and outside state. It is further reported that regular agricultural marketing news as Zariye Khabernama has been started in Kashmir Door Darshan.

Pertinent to mention that most of the fruit crops are rain-fed, need development of irrigation facility in the form of drip/sprinkler irrigation. Site specific nutrient management technique need to be adopted to improve and economize fertilizer use in fruit and vegetable crops.

Strategies need to be evolved for the development of cost effective, eco-friendly crop production and plant protection technologies free from all hazardous chemicals with minimal damage to soil, water, air, plants and animals. Besides diversification of fruit cultivation, cultivation of dry fruits in rain-fed areas is need of the hour. Use of local genotypes of wild fruits like nuts, berries etc shall help in a big way.

“There is need for the production of fruits, vegetables and flowers in off-season and creation of facilities for making off-season products thereof. Rejuvenation of sick and unproductive horticulture units such as orchards, fruit nurseries and processing units etc. Promotion and popularization of hybrid technology in vegetables and establishment of tissue culture laboratories and green houses for mass multiplication of disease free planting material, tubers/corms and seeds. Degraded soils of the fruit crops where crops are growing for decades due to soil erosion or in soil chemical change, need to be given attention to ameliorate it. Above all establishment of modernized fruits and vegetables processing/preservation units.  Infrastructure facilities are needed for post harvest management of horticulture industry in J&K State,” suggest experts.

 

Lack of technical knowledge, lack of soil-tested seeds, high cost of fertilizers retard development of Agriculture/ Horticulture

Hence people urge Govt., to launch Farmers’ awareness programme, provide them subsidized fertilizers and irrigation-facilities to boost production in J&K

 

KASHMIR CENTRIC FOOD SECURITY VISION

3. GLOBAL VILLAGE AGRICULTURE

The world has shrunk into a global village and as such technological developments taking place in any advanced country become known instantly, which help other countries like ours to adopt and follow their techniques to remain updated. One of such countries is Israel, which is characterized by topographical variations and a wide range of soils, enabling the growing and raising of a variety of crops and animals. A large increase in population immediately after 1948 required a rapid increase in food production, followed by development of research and extension facilities and services. In recent years Israel, like many other countries, has faced difficulties in continuing the supply of services it previously provided. This difficulty led agricultural organizations to begin assuming the responsibility of partially financing extension for a few years, and later trying to reflect the cost into the farmers. Farmers are apparently willing to pay for on-farm extension visits. Under this system, the Flower Board is financing many public extension activities and charging the farmer for partial costs of on-farm visits. This system operates successfully, aided by reports that are filed electronically by agents all over Israel to the Floricultural Department Head Office, and from the Head Office to the Flower Board. Advantages of the new system being a tremendous increase in agent-to-farmer commitment; the professional level of agents remains at least the same as before; and the financial situation of the majority of agents is better than before. The disadvantage is that some farmers are consuming less extension than before.

Similarly, California’s land grant extension programme has been successful in assisting agricultural Industries develop as major world producers. Extension has been a leader in facilitating quality-of-state. However, population explosion has transformed California into an urban state, with changing societal issues, values and priorities. Agricultural extension programmes continue to directly serve a declining number of clientele that represent less than 1.5% of the population. Financial support for extension is decreasing at the country and state levels, thus such models used by us in SAU could be catastrophic and need change.

As far as Horticulture sector is concerned, Iran has marched ahead in this field and is one of the world’s top ten horticultural producers. However, post-harvest losses in Iran are six times greater than the world average. Even after establishing an agricultural extension service, Iran still experiences great problems in reducing post-harvest losses. Results revealed that education, material possession, mass media exposure, extension contact, scientific orientation and risk preference were significantly and positively correlated with the knowledge level of farmers pre- and post training. Its model can be adopted after attempting to contain post-harvest losses so that horticultural potential could be exploited and harnessed to improve our economy in J&K State.

“We must remember that agricultural development programmes often produce unexpected results as we have come to know from the history sheet of several countries of the world. This can be attributed to the fact that the target farmers already have their own knowledge and competencies that determine their practices. In order to improve their knowledge, it would be appropriate to adopt models of those countries, which have earned laurels in different sectors of Agriculture. Ours being an agricultural-based economy, so this sector needs to be given due thrust, especially after having failed to revolutionize Industrial sector in Kashmir valley,” suggested a group of keen Watchers of Kashmir valley.

From the study of advanced countries of the world, it has emanated that the attitudes of the farmers have been significantly and positively related to education, organizational membership, land holdings, contact with extension agent, mass media exposure, socio-economic status, awareness, income and material possession. Lack of proper technical knowledge, lack of irrigation facility and high cost of fertilizers/chemical can be the retarding factors to reduce the level of production of agricultural products. Hence, we must lay emphasis on the adoption of models of agriculturally advanced countries of the world so that hackneyed methods are discarded and agricultural base revolutionized to become responsive to our present and future needs in J&K.

 

 Experts suggest replacement of top down planning with grass root planning, improved seeds and extensive participation of farmers

With launching ‘Grow More Food’ slogan, we witnessed green revolution, freedom from hunger, but harmed environment. We have to look for alternate options for the execution of research and develop database for patent formulations. We need replacement of top down planning with grass root planning. And more farmer’s participation reduced risks. Research in past, cantered on improved seeds, irrigation, and chemical use.

Extension education, dissemination of information to farmer has to be the first concern of the public and private establishments and planners. Bird’s eye viewers have to be replaced with visionary professors and professionals.
Farmer farming and farm business shall be the first ranking scientific. Pursuit investing at least an equivalent amount on it has to be spent on health or nuclear establishments. Our polity should be Independent and self-conscious farmers, with records of annual balances, gains and losses, risks and benefits.

We shall have to bring self-reliant proud farmer trained & well versed in Agri-business. Farming concepts and international zoo-phytosanitation recommendations and regulations. We need to stop WTO restrictions or options till our farming and farmers are not completely knowledge driven and economically resourceful to face the global farming competitions.

Four paradigms of Agricultural Extension consists of Technology transfer, prevalent since colonial times & later National Agriculture Extension Project (NAEP), reshaped in 1970-80 as training and visit system across Asia. It involved top down approach. Its role needs discussion. The second paradigm called as Advisory work is what is present system of extension, where, government agencies, NGO and technical industries respond to farmer’s inquiries which we call advisory role. The third paradigm consists of Human Resource Development. This innovation helped Europe and North America. The Universities gave training to rural youth. It is these educated, trained youth, which became future farmers in developed countries. What is known as outreach system of colleges and universities is still unknown in our Agricultural Research System including State Agriculture Universities. A half hearted attempt as Agri-business and Agri-clinical is still to be backed with University, research, banking and economic support. Is it, which can help us to increase productivity in India or Asia needs consideration?

We must remember that the impact of National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) (1986-92) revealed that technologies generated were few and adoption rate not high, even then an estimated monetary benefit of Rs. 2000/ per hectare was observed. Low relationship between technologies developed and adopted  a mixed farming technology capsule as 65% of our farmer’s of our farmer’s are small and marginal farmers. This needs a total shift to left in our agricultural extension methodology. T&V Programme initiated with central assistance in state have around all round technological awareness among agricultural experts. Its dialogue and technology transfer from University (Scientists) to experts’ agricultural extension workers was nearly total revolution. The (ZAREC) Zonal Agricultural advisory Research and Extension counselling was the best plate farm to discuss main issues impeding agricultural development. The missionary publication of production recommendations helps a lot in transfer to technology. The presentation of production recommendations in local language is helpful in increasing productivity in many countries.

“Brinjal production technology adoption in Parbani, Maharashtra was the result of social participation, risk management guarantee, marketing orientation, information websites and communication methods. Various limitation of transport, extension staff was the reasons of poor productivity gains in Malakhand agency of Pakistan. The adoption of legume production technologies under Jodhpur arid conditions was low. The problems as indicated by farmers are small farm size. Small holder farmer was less interested to adopt these technologies. Non-existence of market and pricing policy, risk of failure, feeding habits, social taboo and lack of Post Harvest Technology (PHT) were identified. Proper guidance or information support was the major constraint to 60.8% non-adoption rate among farmers. Other contributory factors are technological unawareness (13.33%), sloppy land (11.31%), farm input cost (9.41%), non-availability of irrigation (8.29%) and lack of inputs (7.95%), said a few experts. ………………………………………………………………………………………(To be continued).

 

Agriculture becoming less remunerative

The  adoption of improved varieties and biotechnological use to make Agriculture more attractive has to be on our top agenda.

  We in developing countries in future will have Industrial expansion to have more economic security. This will mean fewer people being attracted to agriculture or in other words agriculture becoming less remunerative. We need improved varieties, their rapid propagation through biotechnological use. We may have little options not to use modern bio techniques.

This is where we talk now of molecular farming, using biotechnology for more transgenic crops, animals, aquaculture and commercial floriculture.
Besides methodologies for analysis of farming system, options for development & sustainable eco-friendly farm science technology are need of the hour. We do have subject-matter-specialists, but the agents for evaluating the composite effect of various discipline oriented technology cover is yet to be structured. This is exactly where we should intervene and restructures the discipline, programmes and divisions of extension education in the country. In fact a total change from existing slow action, low innovative, conventional and disintegrated extension system has to be refined into analytic, manage mental, social, economical, marketable system, so that the whole technology transfer could be evaluated in terms of productivity and combinations need to be evaluated & monitored. The impact analysis of wide range of agricultural technology transfer be it training, entrepreneurship or agric business is needed, both before and after technology application.

A survey conducted among 120 farmers in Kurnool district, Andhra Pradesh, India, revealed that education, social participation, scientific orientation, risk management, mass media exposure, economic and market orientation were positively and significantly correlated to the extent of adoption recommended hybrid jowar (sorghum) seed practices by the farmers. Majority of the farmers (43.33%) had a medium level of the adoption of the recommended practices. (Kumar et al, 2005). It is suggested that five categories of factors determine the adoption of irrigation systems and are the keys to designing relevant, effective and innovative irrigation extension programmes among horticulturists. The five categories of factories being soil type and topography; crop quality; sowing time; saving water and crop yield (Kaine & Beswell, 2005). We in J&K under SREP Strategic Research extension plan of Districts notice lack of information on sowing time, seed rate and fertilizer application in almost all the crops.

“The available research results have to pierce the farmers farming practices. Non-adoption is the result of our low productivity levels per unit of land. Inspire of tremendous yield gains, the per unit profitability has not raised the economic conditions of our farmers. Our farm economy still fluctuates between seasons’ rainy years among regions. Now for any widespread rains farm technology, it is essential to know its impact and adaptability rate. It is therefore necessary to develop new technologies after considering socio-organizational arrangements, local existing soil, water, human needs and resources. The local skills need to be known and refinement is made to improve profitability. Our experience under IVLP showed a net productivity gains of 2 /hac in rice production by improving local village driven plough. Similar innovative ideas and local technologies with improved or exotic ones gave good results in development of profitable farming,” remarked some knowledgeable persons of Kashmir valley.

Hence conscientious citizens suggest that improved varieties and adoption of latest technologies need to be adopted to revolutionize agricultural production to woo farmers, who can get attracted by industrial expansion to earn quick bucks. It is not the question of monetary considerations, but the level of agricultural production to ensure food security .

 

Low agricultural production is attributed to untested fertilizers, economic constraints and lack of advanced technology

Hence application of Precision Agriculture needs to be clubbed with information and communication networking to boost productivity in J&K

In Kenya, use of advanced information and communication technologies reduced gaps in yields of agricultural crops between research and farmer’s fields. It is the country where 70% population is connected with agriculture for livelihood directly or indirectly and 80% of its export is agricultural oriented. Reduction in yield gaps through effective use of information and communication technology will have a significant impact.

This stands proved by the low productivity in Soybean, which was found to be due to partial adoption of production recommendations by farmers in Maharashtra. The low yield factors were analyzed. Economic constraints, situational factors and communication gaps on crop production, protection, seed treatment and fertilizer application were found responsible for it. The modernization of agricultural production and rural development on a pilot basis could have worked well.

It has been observed that Precision Agriculture till date has focused on site-specific data collection for soil and crop management. The technologies for the site-specific field operations and automated data recording are available, but precision agriculture rarely involves them for improvement. The application of precision agriculture has to be clubbed with information and communication networking to harvest the gains and to improve productivity. This network may consist of an open software platform, which can be operated by the farmer himself. For efficient communication Internet and mobile telecommunication have been identified as important components. The development of an information and communication network integrating modern software and hardware technologies in a new user-friendly manner is necessary to achieve better acceptance of technologies and improved productivity.

It is worth mentioning that the Australian centre for remote sensing (ACRES) has introduced a new service to provide satellite data for near real time applications. The STAR (Speedy Transmission after reception) service provides access to digital satellite data products in full resolution or compressed format within 12 hrs of a Satellite overpass. The data obtained from ground stations is processed at a facility via a high-speed communication link and high priority procession. This system provides Satellite data on critical applications, like crop yield modelling, pre-harvest crop production forecasting, detecting crop diseases, monitoring crop stress, pest infestation, floods, fires and oil-spills. SPOT –late is a low cost, off the shelf satellite data product from ACRES that is ideal for use in Geographical information system (GIS). SPOT-LIFE can be accessed at any time via the Internet and is available in the form of tiles covering most of Australia.  Advance studies with high applications for increasing agricultural production needs quick dissemination. The effect of rooting zone restriction (RZR) on vegetative and reproduction growth of fruit trees via grapes, peach and citrus has been investigated. It is known that it improved crop productivity under low availability of water.

“The available communication facilities for agricultural information in 15 states of India were studied. The results suggest that while communication networking opens up agricultural economy, it is not cost effective. The communication networking has to become cost effective. An attempt to have better communication between various forest research divisions and other organizations interested in sustainable forestry has shown encouraging results. An attempt was made to have quick information flow among and between researchers, extension officers and dairy farmers in East Azerbaijan. The information input, output and intersystem communication were studied.  The information likes advertising, public relation and personal selling was found to be best promoters,” said a group of knowledgeable persons of Kashmir valley.

In the “Unique Selling” approach of the communicator effects target audience, the impact of integrated approach utilizing computers in agricultural information & dissemination in Greece and Poland was studied.  The gap in technology known and applied at farmers’ field was found. Researchers lack training in using new information technologies. Thus improvement in agricultural productivity has to keep pace with advanced communication and information technology using computers. Hence application of Precision Agriculture needs to be clubbed with information and communication networking to boost productivity in J&K

 

China, Denmark and other countries have made remarkable progress in the field  of Agriculture, Animal husbandry

Hence Experts suggest copying their models to gain experience and improve our socio-economic conditions in J&K

In order to improve our socio-economic conditions, we must undertake study of other countries of the world to see how they have marched ahead.  Chinese experience needs a try as their successful improvement of Sheep and yak herds can be a good example for use in India. Under this project, they first took stock of rangeland and livestock resources. Then socio-economic conditions of the livestock breeders were analyzed. Livestock and pasture management by rodents was studied. Rangeland revelation methods were tested and propagated. Seeded fodders and effect of these improved methods of pasture development on disease control and profits from livestock were analyzed.  Thus, the extension education programmes should ensure facilitation of Farmer empowerment and not dependence on subsidy. This means incorporating studies and programmes of Agri-livestock economics, grassland and rangeland management, crop and tree production in Agri-extension curricula.

Similarly, a new participating approach of clubbing local and outside knowledge to solve the agricultural problem is needed. Innovate approaches for soil and water conservation in Ethiopia and Tanzania was helpful. A new model of particularly modified Technology development approach is first being recognized, as the only way of clubbing traditional and modern technologies for agric-development.

The Dutch Model for total reformation of agricultural technology transfer shall need refinement of elementary methodologies used in extension consisting of PRA, PERT or other specific management, communication and modern IS-Geographic Information System use. This would involve a total change in Extension Education, objectives, methodology & course curriculum. We need agricultural networking for bringing out results of transferable technologies. Experimental learning and knowledge sharing has to be incorporated, as research on farmers field. Farmers have to be part of our learning, and experimentation process. Dutch model could be used. In India to ensure quick technology use. Let us evaluate technology use. It been seen that some progressive farmers have awareness of technology but being absentee farmers, their workers have no knowledge or skills to use them in the field. It is time to come out of “Technology dissemination Scenario” to “Technology Use Status in the field” and “Productivity gain assessment models”.

“Besides experience learning, market designs, farm economics, sustainable agriculture, Agri-information, communication skills and farm business shall be the knowledge bank available to Agri-Extension & communication experts, whom we should name “FBM” – “Farm Business management Experts”, suggest a group of experts of Kashmir valley.

The Extension Education is outdated and too often used and misunderstood phrase. Extension includes now every attempt to communicate with farmers. Today’s Extension agencies can be university scientists, Subject matter specialists, Agri experts, farmers or even partially Agri known NGO or their agents. Thus, the whole blame of others has to be shared by University experts. Agri-University, applied knowledge has to be communicated to farmers as “end product” as pharmaceutical companies do. Thus all the current ‘building block”, known knowledge has to be computerized and stored. This has to be reshaped and re-arranged as knowledge packs for innovative and whole farming capsules rather than one commodity knowledge sharing as in the West. We do have commodity but not composite agriculture packages. A booklet on its composite effects has been published as Broad Based Extension Education. Training & visits on farm level failed but farmer-training & farmer-research participation or demonstrations at farmers’ field did achieve a great success. With constraints of men and resources and crop insurance in vogue, we must induce researchers to have direct participatory research at farmer’s doors, on their fields. This venture can be on cost-sharing basis or with participatory involvement of Industry.
Our farm economy still depends on seasonal rains, lacks assured irrigation facilities and lacks technological back up

New strategies and our missions

Hence people demand development of Canal-networks and  adoption of Chinese Model to improve food production in J&K

Methodologies for analysis of farming system, options for development & sustainable eco-friendly farm science technology are needs of the hour. We do have subject-matter-specialists, but the agents for evaluating the composite effect of various discipline oriented technology covers is yet to be structured. This is exactly where we should intervene and restructures the discipline, programmes and divisions of extension education in the country. In fact a total change from existing slow action, low innovative, conventional and disintegrated extension system has to be refined into analytic, management, social, economical, marketable system, so that the whole technology transfer could be evaluated in terms of productivity and combinations need to be evaluated & monitored. The impact analysis of wide range of agricultural technology transfer be it training, entrepreneurship or agri-business is needed, both before and after technology application.

  The available research results have to pierce the farmers farming practices. Non-adoption is the result of our low productivity levels per unit of land. Inspire of tremendous yield gains per unit profitability has not raised the economic conditions of our farmers. Our farm economy still fluctuates between seasons, rainy years and among regions. Now for any widespread rains from technology, it is essential to know its impact and adaptability rate. It is therefore necessary to develop new technologies after considering socio-organizational arrangements, local existing soil, water, human needs and resources. The local skills need to be known and refinement made to improve profitability.

“Chinese experiences need a try under our socio-economic conditions. Besides successful improvement of Sheep and yak herds in China can be a good example for use in our country in general and J&K in particular. Under this project they first took stock of range-land and livestock resources. Then socio-economic conditions of the livestock breeders were analysed. Livestock and pasture management by rodents was studied. Rangeland revelation methods were tested and propagated. Seeded fodders and effect of these improved methods of pasture development on disease control and profits from livestock were analysed.  Thus extension education programmes should ensure facilitation of Farmer empowerment and not dependence on subsidy. This means incorporating studies and programmes of Agri-livestock economics, grassland and range land management, crop and tree production in Agri-extension curricula,” suggested a few prominent experts of Kashmir valley.

A new participating approach of clubbing local and outside knowledge to solve the agricultural problem is needed. Innovate approaches for soil and water conservation in Ethiopia and Tanzania were helpful. A new model of particularly modified Technology development approach is first being recognized, as the only way of clubbing traditional and modern technologies for agric-development. The total reformation of agricultural technology transfer shall need refinement of elementary methodologies used in extension consisting of PRA, PERT or other specific management, communication and modern IS-Geographic Information System use. This would involve a total change in Extension Education, objectives, methodology & course curriculum. We need agricultural networking for bringing out results of transferable technologies. Experimental learning and knowledge sharing has to be incorporated, as research on farmers field. Farmers have to be part of our learning, and experimentation process. Dutch model could be used in India to ensure quick technology use. Let us evaluate technology use. It been seen that some progressive farmers have awareness of technology but being absentee farmers, their workers have no knowledge or skills to use them in the field.

Small farmers are neglected by extension services and need proper awareness. Agricultural extension specialists must specialize in community structure, development, education learning tools, technology and policy issues. Thus these disciplines or topics need incorporation in Farm business Management curriculum. Partnership process, management and communication should be the main thrust. Co-operative mechanism, farm business management and evaluation and monitoring tools should be used.

But for revolutionizing our farm economy, people demand development of Canal-networks and adoption of latest Models to improve food production in J&K.Our irrigation system has not come up to our requirements despite pumping huge sums of money in this Sector. Therefore, there is urgent need to develop scientific irrigation system to reduce dependence on rains and share experiences of other advanced countries, particularly that of China to boost food production in J&K State.

Spiders Help Farmers Grow Safer Crops: China and California, USA part 1

Survey Shows Majority of California Pear Growers Practice Sustainable Farming
SACRAMENTO, Calif.—-A recent survey of California pear farmers has found that when it comes to sustainable farming practices such as employing Integrated Pest Management methods to reduce the use of pesticides, the California pear industry has a very high level of adoption.

Pest Control Board

Written by admin on . Posted in Pest Control

pest control board
Is this standard procedure in pest control?

I saw a short video on how to capture mice. It was done by a professional pest control operator from ABC Pest Control. One of the methods he showed was using a glue board. But what did surprise me what that he said once the mouse is caught on the glue board, you throw it away. This struck me as not only odd, but certainly very cruel. Is it standard procedure to catch a mouse on a glue board, just to throw them away in the rubbish if they are still alive?

The guy offered nothing on what to do with them if they’re alive. No humane methods of killing, no release tricks, nothing. Just “throw it out with the trap”. This has really made me question the ethics of such a method. Aren’t these pest control people qualified enough to put an animal out of its misery if it is alive on a trap?

Leaving an animal to starve to death doesn’t sit well with me at all. Especially when there’s the option to kill it humanely.

Glue traps are crueller to animals than simply making them starve to death. Animals caught in then often suffocate, die from exhaustion due to struggling, there have even been accounts of some animals being seen attempting to bite through their own limbs in order to try and escape. Animals caught in glue traps die a slow and agonizing death. Even larger animals like pets can suffer because of them, they may be able to free themselves, but usually at the cost of some fur or skin. My advice, stay away from glue traps, if you have rodent problems there are humane alternatives such as this: http://www.greenhome.com/products/pest_control/garden_pests/rod000001/ I hope that helps!

Multi Sprayer for pest control HF-1500F.mpg

How Flooding Can Affect Pest Control

Floods can be harmful to human and animal lives and origin vast, costly spoil to land and acreage. As delightful as it to think that flooding at slightest rids us of redundant mice in and around our homes, the opposite is firm.

There are many vermin that breed and succeed in flooded areas. They steadily use the excessive damp provided by flooding along the banks of rivers and lakes and small pools of ranking water to lay eggs in, and to develop large colonies of larvae pending they shade.

Some vermin don’t like living in flooded areas, but they are somewhat hardy, and even intelligent in their ability to assemble in hasty craze and move away from threats such as flooding. Ants for example can transfer an entirety colony to a dryer locale in sheer hours. They are especially adept at making themselves at home- inside your home.

Rats, mice and other rats are active year about though we don’t always detect their population growths and activities as much in colder months. Hordes of insects and vermin like mosquitoes, ants, beetles, ladybugs, crickets, bees, and others will be on the move in seek of food, and more noticeable in the stove months of leap and summer.

It has been an especially wet collapse and iciness period with many areas of the country experiencing flooding thus far, and jump rains are almost now winning us. We can suppose there to be an overabundant quantity of a strain of rats to satisfy with as our temperatures heat up. You neediness to open looking for, and eliminating those gear in and around your home that interest mice now, before they are able to invade.

Taking steps now to safeguard against an invasion of rats offers you the best casual to keep them in score so that they can’t worry you and your family. It could be quite costly and extremely grim to combat and eliminate vermin once they have already invaded your acreage and home. Pesticides can also be risky to the wellbeing of family and pets when worn in large quantities to combat an offered large population of vermin.

Given the opportunity, vermin can erect several tunnels and elude routes that can be hard to find and eliminate everyone of, to slaughter off an entire colony of vermin. Pests can also buckskin themselves away in hard to range areas in and around your home. The mice that wait even after you have worn pesticides, traps, and other tools to slay them off after an invasion, will last breeding and rebuilding their facts.

You can make your yard and home fewer attractive to mice. Purchase matter that was planned to sicken mice and repress them regularly to ensure that they are still functioning correctly. Consider having your home and yard treated annually by an exterminator to stop vermin from invading. Get rid of, or make repairs to the clothes in and around your home that draw annoyance invasions and permit explosions in pest populations.

Fill holes in your yard with dirt or rocks so rain cannot amass in them and invent appealing nurseries for mice. Trash cans should have locking lids to keep water, rodents, and mice out of them. Empty bird baths daily to keep any water in them from fitting stagnate and attracting vermin. Clear away yard debris to eliminate the flawless home for many vermin.

Check your homes foundation and outside ramparts for cracks and gaps and satisfy them in because pests use these to reap account into your home. You will also want to refurbish cracking and holes in definite steps, porches, driveways, and sidewalks because these also bestow pests areas in which to live and heighten in figures. Inspect the garret, and basement from inside your home for cracks, leaking pipes, floppy boards and holes, and invoice the caulking around windows and doors, and healing them as needed to keep pests out.

You may yearn to have an annual shrivel with an exterminator for the amity of view and not having to observer your home and yard for pests so narrowly. You may even craving to have an exterminator come out and evaluate the spirit of pests in and around your home and to item out areas that neediness to be permanent to keep pests away.

Do-it-yourselfers should keep in attention that the number of pests they are since, though it may seem they see a lot of them: is only a portion of the actual number of pests that survive in a colony. If you have tried yield that can be purchased at lawn and backyard food and well as bigger attach stores in a stab to get ridding of pests, yet you are still seeing them-it time to call a professional exterminator to rid your home and yard of pests.

California Exterminator

Written by admin on . Posted in Exterminators

california exterminator
Resident relocates beehive, saves honeybees
RHE — Honeybees are Southern California’s No.-1 pollinators, according to professional beekeeper Bill Walter. So imagine his effort to save a hive, even if it is tucked away in someone’s attic, like that of Rolling Hills Estates resident Donna Tarr.
Southern California Exterminators – Stanton, CA

Cockroach Exterminator for my apartment ???

ok i need a Cockroach exterminator for my apartment , do any one knows the best company i could hire i liv in southern california ….. tx

no, you get ‘em during the winter!

Exterminator Los Angeles

Written by admin on . Posted in Exterminators

exterminator los angeles
exterminator los angeles

Downey Termite Bee

Try these home remedies before invoking the Professional Roach fighter in Los Angeles and save! If you are suffering from infection of roach, you probably want to get right on the phone and call the best fighter possible roach in Los Angeles. Roach contamination can be both disturbing and unhealthy, and you probably want to get it resolved as soon as possible.

But before you start calling companies that promise to provide “guaranteed pest control in Los Angeles, you can try several strategies to implement your own first. Of course, before you can proceed to implement the procedure roach extermination, you must first determine where the pests are coming from. Doing so, you can target the roach directly to the source. Keep in mind that cockroaches can enter through very small cracks and holes, so that their point of entry may be less obvious. They may well enter the structure through the ventilation and drainage pipes.

It is obvious that even the best fighters roach in Los Angeles can not seal every nook and cranny that the roach can use to log on – so that you can not either! Nevertheless, by identifying as many points of entry, perhaps you’ll be able to more effectively influence your roach problem.

There are several methods you can try before calling a company offering guaranteed pest control Los Angeles. Some of these include. Combining 1 part boric acid to 2 parts flour and 1 part cocoa creates a natural insecticide that cockroaches, like taking back to their fry

There are also many sprays sold today, that you can buy to spray on the walls, in holes and crevices in Roach bait attracts the cockroaches, which are then eaten the poison in the bait and take it back to their nests. Traps lure cockroaches, but they are stuck inside, but they do not eat deadly poison, and eventually die Water Jars Accommodation in a jar of water near the walls can get cockroaches, but they can not escape, and thus drown.

Once used only by professional fighters, concentrates are becoming more accessible to the public, they may be destroyed, or sprayed on the surface disentangle.

Depending on the extent of your roach contamination, these pets medication may not work. If you do not succeed with the principal remedy, you should contact a professional fighter roach in Los Angeles, to help resolve the problem. Make sure that the company gives you to choose the “guaranteed pest control in Los Angeles, so you can be sure that cockroaches will be destroyed and not returned.

Pest Control License California

Written by admin on . Posted in Pest Control

pest control license california
California Pest Control Licenses – An Overview for Agriculture and Landscape Students

what license do or permits do you need in California to start a pest control business?

California Business and Professions Code section 8550, subdivision (a) provides that, “It is unlawful for any individual to engage or offer to engage in the business or practice of structural pest control, as defined in Section 8505, unless he or she is licensed under this chapter.” http://www.pestboard.ca.gov/pestlaw/pestact.pdf

Local authorities may require a pest control operator to register locally and to get a business permit.

*/End of Line.

Genetically modified food

Method

Genetic modification involves the insertion or deletion of genes. In the process of Cisgenesis genes are artificially transferred between organisms that could be conventionally bred. In the process of Transgenesis genes from a different species are inserted, which is a form of horizontal gene transfer. In nature this can occur when exogenous DNA penetrates the cell membrane for any reason. To do this artificially may require attaching the genes to a virus or just physically inserting the extra DNA into the nucleus of the intended host with a very small syringe, or with very small particles fired from a gene gun. However, other methods exploit natural forms of gene transfer, such as the ability of Agrobacterium to transfer genetic material to plants, and the ability of lentiviruses to transfer genes to animal cells.

Development

The first commercially grown genetically modified whole food crop was a tomato (called FlavrSavr), which was modified to ripen without softening, by a Californian company Calgene. Calgene took the initiative to obtain FDA approval for its release in 1994 without any special labeling, although legally no such approval was required. It was welcomed by consumers who purchased the fruit at a substantial premium over the price of regular tomatoes. However, production problems and competition from a conventionally bred, longer shelf-life variety prevented the product from becoming profitable. A variant of the Flavr Savr was used by Zeneca to produce tomato paste which was sold in Europe during the summer of 1996. The labeling and pricing were designed as a marketing experiment, which proved, at the time, that European consumers would accept genetically engineered foods.

Currently, there are a number of food species in which a genetically modified version exists.

Food

Properties of the genetically modified variety

Modification

Percent Modified in US

Percent Modified in world

Soybeans

Resistant to glyphosate or glufosinate herbicides

Herbicide resistant gene taken from bacteria inserted into soybean

89%

TBA

Corn, field

Resistant to glyphosate or glufosinate herbicides, Insect resistance – using Bt proteins some previously used as pesticides in organic crop production.

Vitamin-enriched corn derived from South African white corn variety M37W has bright orange kernels, with 169x increase in beta carotene, 6x the vitamin C and 2x folate. || New genes added/transferred into plant genome. || 60% || TBA

Cotton (cottonseed oil)

Pest-resistant cotton

Bt crystal protein gene added/transferred into plant genome

83%

62%

Hawaiian papaya

Variety is resistant to the papaya ringspot virus.

New gene added/transferred into plant genome

+50%

TBA

Tomatoes

Variety in which the production of the enzyme polygalacturonase (PG) is suppressed, retarding fruit softening after harvesting.

A reverse copy (an antisense gene) of the gene responsible for the production of PG enzyme added into plant genome

Taken off the market due to commercial failure.

None

Potatoes

Amflora variety produces waxy potato starch composed almost exclusively of the amylopectin component of starch.

The gene for granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) (the key enzyme for the synthesis of amylose) was switched off by inserting antisense copy of the GBSS gene.

Amflora will be produced solely under contract farming conditions and not made available on the general market.

TBA

Rapeseed (Canola)

Resistance to herbicides (glyphosate or glufosinate), high laurate canola

New genes added/transferred into plant genome

75%

TBA

Sugar cane

Resistance to certain pesticides, high-sucrose cane.

New genes added/transferred into plant genome

TBA

TBA

Sugar beet

Resistance to glyphosate, glufosinate herbicides

New genes added/transferred into plant genome

TBA

TBA

Sweet corn

Produces its own bioinsecticide (Bt toxin)

Gene from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis added to the plant.

TBA

TBA

Rice

Genetically modified to contain high amounts of Vitamin A (beta-carotene)

“Golden rice” Three new genes implanted: two from daffodils and the third from a bacterium

TBA

TBA

In addition, various genetically engineered micro-organisms are routinely used as sources of enzymes for the manufacture of a wide variety of processed foods. These include alpha-amylase from bacteria, which converts starch to simple sugars, chymosin from bacteria or fungi that clots milk protein for cheese making, and pectinesterase from fungi which improves fruit juice clarity.

Growing Genetically Modified crops

Between 1997 and 2005, the total surface area of land cultivated with GMOs had increased by a factor of 50, from 17,000 km2 (4.2 million acres) to 900,000 km2 (222 million acres).

Although most GM crops are grown in North America, in recent years there has been rapid growth in the area sown in developing countries. For instance in 2005 the largest increase in crop area planted to GM crops (soybeans) was in Brazil (94,000 km2 in 2005 versus 50,000 km2 in 2004.) There has also been rapid and continuing expansion of GM cotton varieties in India since 2002. (Cotton is a major source of vegetable cooking oil and animal feed.) It is predicted that in 2008/9 32,000 km2 of GM cotton will be harvested in India (up more than 100 percent from the previous season).

Indian national average cotton yields of GM cotton were seven times lower in 2002, because the parental cotton plant used in the genetic engineered variant was not well suited to the climate of India and failed. The publicity given to transgenic trait Bt insect resistance has encouraged the adoption of better performing hybrid cotton varieties, and the Bt trait has substantially reduced losses to insect predation. Though controversial and often disputed, economic and environmental benefits of GM cotton in India to the individual farmer have been documented.

In 2003, countries that grew 99% of the global transgenic crops were the United States (63%), Argentina (21%), Canada (6%), Brazil (4%), China (4%), and South Africa (1%). The Grocery Manufacturers of America estimate that 75% of all processed foods in the U.S. contain a GM ingredient . In particular, Bt corn, which produces the pesticide within the plant itself, is widely grown, as are soybeans genetically designed to tolerate glyphosate herbicides. These constitute “input-traits” are aimed to financially benefit the producers, have indirect environmental benefits and marginal cost benefits to consumers.

In the US, by 2006 89% of the planted area of soybeans, 83% of cotton, and 61% corn were genetically modified varieties. Genetically modified soybeans carried herbicide-tolerant traits only, but maize and cotton carried both herbicide tolerance and insect protection traits (the latter largely the Bacillus thuringiensis Bt insecticidal protein). In the period 2002 to 2006, there were significant increases in the area planted to Bt protected cotton and maize, and herbicide tolerant maize also increased in sown area.

Crop yields

Some scientific studies have claimed that genetically modified varieties of plants do not produce higher crop yields than normal plants. However, other scientific studies dispute these claims.[citation needed]

One study by Charles Benbrook, Chief Scientist of the Organic Center, found that genetically engineered Roundup Ready soybeans do not increase yields (Bendrook, 1999). The report reviewed over 8,200 university trials in 1998 and found that Roundup Ready soybeans yielded 7-10% less than similar natural varieties. In addition, the same study found that farmers used 5-10 times more herbicide (Roundup) on Roundup Ready soybeans than on conventional ones.

Coexistence and traceability

The United States and Canada do not require labeling of genetically modified foods. However in certain other regions, such as the European Union, Japan, Malaysia and Australia, governments have required labeling so consumers can exercise choice between foods that have genetically modified, conventional or organic origins. This requires a labeling system as well as the reliable separation of GM and non-GM organisms at production level and throughout the whole processing chain. Research suggests that this may prove impossible.[citation needed]

For traceability, the OECD has introduced a “unique identifier” which is given to any GMO when it is approved. This unique identifier must be forwarded at every stage of processing.[citation needed] Many countries have established labeling regulations and guidelines on coexistence and traceability. Research projects such as Co-Extra, SIGMEA and Transcontainer are aimed at investigating improved methods for ensuring coexistence and providing stakeholders the tools required for the implementation of coexistence and traceability.[citation needed]

Detection

Testing on GMOs in food and feed is routinely done using molecular techniques like DNA microarrays or qPCR. These tests can be based on screening genetic elements (like p35S, tNos, pat, or bar) or event-specific markers for the official GMOs (like Mon810, Bt11, or GT73). The array-based method combines multiplex PCR and array technology to screen samples for different potential GMOs , combining different approaches (screening elements, plant-specific markers, and event-specific markers).

The qPCR is used to detect specific GMO events by usage of specific primers for screening elements or event-specific markers. Controls are necessary to avoid false positive or false negative results. For example, a test for CaMV is used to avoid a false positive in the event of a virus contaminated sample.

PLU codes

A Price Look-Up code beginning with the digit 8 indicates genetically modified food.

Controversy

Main article: GM food controversy

While it is evident that there is a food supply issue; the question is whether GM can solve world hunger problems. Several scientists argue that in order to meet the demand for food in the developing world, a second green revolution with increased use of GM crops is needed. Others argue that there is more than enough food in the world and that the hunger crisis is caused by problems in food distribution and politics, not production. Recently some critics have changed their minds on the issue with respect to the need for additional food supplies.

enetic modification is analogous to nuclear power: nobody loves it, but climate change has made its adoption imperative, says economist Paul Collier of Oxford University. “Declining genetic modification makes a complicated issue more complex. Genetic modification offers both faster crop adaptation and a biological, rather than chemical, approach to yield increases.”

On the other hand, many believe that GMF have not been a success and that we should devote our efforts and money into another solution. e need biodiversity intensification that works with nature nutrient and water cycles, not against them, says Vandana Shiva. Shiva, the founder of Navdanya, the movement of 500,000 seed keepers and organic farmers in India, argues that GMF have not increased yields. Recently, Doug Gurian-Sherman, a member of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit science advocacy group, published a report called ailure to Yield, in which he stated that in a nearly 20 year record, genetically engineered crops have not increased yields.

Taking a more technical approach, GMF help farmers produce, despite the odds or any environmental barriers. hile new technology must be tested before it is commercially released, we should be mindful of the risks of not releasing it at all, says Per Pinstrup-Andersen professor of Food, Nutrition and Public Policy at Cornell University. Per Pinstrup-Anderson argues, isguided anti-science ideology and failure by governments to prioritize agricultural and rural development in developing countries brought us the food crisis. He clearly states the challenge we face is not the challenge of whether we have enough resources to produce, but whether we will change our behavior.

Economic and political effects

Adoption of genetically-engineered crops in the United States.

Many proponents of genetically engineered crops claim they lower pesticide usage and have brought higher yields and profitability to many farmers, including those in developing nations.

The United States has seen a widespread adoption of genetically-engineered corn, cotton and soybean crops over the last decade (see figure).

In August 2003, Zambia cut off the flow of Genetically Modified Food (mostly maize) from UN’s World Food Programme. This left a famine-stricken population without food aid.

In December 2005 the Zambian government changed its mind in the face of further famine and allowed the importation of GM maize. However, the Zambian Minister for Agriculture Mundia Sikatana has insisted that the ban on genetically modified maize remains, saying “We do not want GM (genetically modified) foods and our hope is that all of us can continue to produce non-GM foods.”

In April 2004 Hugo Chvez announced a total ban on genetically modified seeds in Venezuela.

In January 2005, the Hungarian government announced a ban on importing and planting of genetic modified maize seeds, which was subsequently authorized by the EU.

On August 18, 2006, American exports of rice to Europe were interrupted when much of the U.S. crop was confirmed to be contaminated with unapproved engineered genes, possibly due to accidental cross-pollination with conventional crops.

On February 9, 2010, Indian Environment Minister, Jairam Ramesh, imposed a moratorium on the cultivation of GMF “for as long as it is needed to establish public trust and confidence”. His decision was made after protest from several groups responding to regulatory approval of the cultivation of Bt Brinjal, a GM eggplant in October, 2009.

Intellectual property

Traditionally, farmers in all nations saved their own seed from year to year. Allowing to follow this practice with genetically modified seed would result in seed developers losing the ability to profit from their breeding work. Therefore, genetically-modified seed are subject to licensing by their developers in contracts that are written to prevent farmers from following this traditional practice. Many objections to genetically modified food crops are based on this change.

Main article: Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser

Enforcement of patents on genetically modified plants is often contentious, especially because of gene flow. In 1998, 95-98 percent of about 10 km2 planted with canola by Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser were found to contain Monsanto Company’s patented Roundup Ready gene although Schmeiser had never purchased seed from Monsanto. The initial source of the plants was undetermined, and could have been through either gene flow or intentional theft. However, the overwhelming predominance of the trait implied that Schmeiser must have intentionally selected for it. The court determined that Schmeiser had saved seed from areas on and adjacent to his property where Roundup had been sprayed, such as ditches and near power poles.

Although unable to prove direct theft, Monsanto sued Schmeiser for piracy since he knowingly grew Roundup Ready plants without paying royalties(Ibid). The case made it to the Canadian Supreme Court, which in 2004 ruled 5 to 4 in Monsanto favor. The dissenting judges focused primarily on the fact that Monsanto’s patents covered only the gene itself and glyphosate resistant cells, and failed to cover transgenic plants in their entirety. All of the judges agreed that Schmeiser would not have to pay any damages since he had not benefited from his use of the genetically modified seed.

In response to criticism, Monsanto Canada’s Director of Public Affairs stated that “It is not, nor has it ever been Monsanto Canada’s policy to enforce its patent on Roundup Ready crops when they are present on a farmer’s field by accident…Only when there has been a knowing and deliberate violation of its patent rights will Monsanto act.”

Future developments

Future envisaged applications of GMOs are diverse and include drugs in food, bananas that produce human vaccines against infectious diseases such as Hepatitis B, metabolically engineered fish that mature more quickly, fruit and nut trees that yield years earlier, foods no longer containing properties associated with common intolerances, and plants that produce new plastics with unique properties. While their practicality or efficacy in commercial production has yet to be fully tested, the next decade may see exponential increases in GM product development as researchers gain increasing access to genomic resources that are applicable to organisms beyond the scope of individual projects. Safety testing of these products will also, at the same time, be necessary to ensure that the perceived benefits will indeed outweigh the perceived and hidden costs of development. Plant scientists, backed by results of modern comprehensive profiling of crop composition, point out that crops modified using GM techniques are less likely to have unintended changes than are conventionally bred crops.

Health risks

In the United States, the FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition must approve the nutritional characteristics of GMO foods on the basis of comparability to conventionally-produced foods. The table below shows the foods that had received FDA approval as of 2002.

A 2008 review published by the Royal Society of Medicine noted that GM foods have been eaten by millions of people worldwide for over 15 years, with no reports of ill effects. Similarly a 2004 report from the US National Academies of Sciences stated: “To date, no adverse health effects attributed to genetic engineering have been documented in the human population.” Worldwide, there are a range of perspectives within non-governmental organizations on the safety of GM foods. For example, the US pro-GM pressure group AgBioWorld has argued that GM foods have been proven safe, while other pressure groups and consumer rights groups, such as the Organic Consumers Association, and Greenpeace claim the long term health risks which GM could pose, or the environmental risks associated with GM, have not yet been adequately investigated.

In 1998 Rowett Research Institute scientist rpd Pusztai reported that consumption of potatoes genetically modified to contain lectin had adverse intestinal effects on rats. Pusztai eventually published a paper, co-authored by Stanley Ewen, in the journal, The Lancet. The paper claimed to show that rats fed on potatoes genetically modified with the snowdrop lectin had unusual changes to their gut tissue when compared with rats fed on non modified potatoes. The experiment has been criticised by other scientists on the grounds that the unmodified potatoes were not a fair control diet and that all the rats may have been sick, due to them being fed a diet of only potatoes.

In 2010 three scientists published a statistical re-analysis of three feeding trials that had previously been published by others as establishing the safety of genetically modified corn. The new article claimed that their statistics instead showed that the three patented crops (Mon 810, Mon 863, and NK 603) developed and owned by Monsanto cause liver, kidney, and heart damage in mammals. A previous re-analysis of part of this data by the same group of scientists was assessed by a panel of independent toxicologists in a study funded by Monsanto and published in the journal Food and chemical toxicology, the reviewers reported that the study was statistically flawed and providing no evidence of adverse effects.

Gene transfer

As of January 2009 there has only been one human feeding study conducted on the effects of genetically modified foods. The study involved seven human volunteers who had previously had their large intestines removed. These volunteers were to eat GM soy to see if the DNA of the GM soy transferred to the bacteria that naturally lives in the human gut. Researchers identified that three of the seven volunteers had transgenes from GM soy transferred into the bacteria living in their gut, though none of the gene transfers occurred during the course of the study. In volunteers with complete digestive tracts, the transgene did not survive passage through intact gastrointestinal tract. Anti-GM advocates believe the study should prompt additional testing to determine its significance.

A study on the possible effects of feeding genetically modified feeds to animals found that there was no significant differences in the safety and nutritional value of feedstuffs containing material derived from genetically modified plants. Specifically, the study noted that no residues of recombinant DNA or novel proteins have been found in any organ or tissue samples obtained from animals fed with GMP plants.

Allergies

In the mid 1990s Pioneer Hi-Bred tested the allergenicity of a transgenic soybean that expressed a Brazil nut seed storage protein in hope that the seeds would have increased levels of the amino acid methionine. The tests (radioallergosorbent testing, immunoblotting, and skin-prick testing) showed that individuals allergic to Brazil nuts were also allergic to the new GM soybean. Pioneer has indicated that it will not develop commercial cultivars containing Brazil nut protein because the protein is likely to be an allergen.

See also

Plant breeding

Transgenic plant

International trade of genetically modified foods

References

^ Kang JX et al. (2007). “Why the omega-3 should go to market”. Nature Biotechnology 25 (5): 505506. doi:10.1038/nbt0507-505. http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v25/n5/full/nbt0507-505.html. Retrieved 2009-03-29. 

^ Fiester, A. (2006). “Why the omega-3 piggy should not go to market”. Nature Biotechnology 24: 14721473. doi:10.1038/nbt1206-1472. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=bioethics_papers. Retrieved 2009-03-29. 

^ Lai L et al. (2006). “Generation of cloned transgenic pigs rich in omega-3 fatty acids”. Nature Biotechnology 24 (4): 435436. doi:10.1038/nbt1198. http://pmbcii.psy.cmu.edu/evans/2006_Lia.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-29. 

^ Guelph Transgenic Pig Research Program: EnviropigTM an environmentally friendly breed of pigs that utilizes plant phosphorus efficiently. November 04, 2005.

^ a b NRC. (2004). Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. National Academies Press. Free full text.

^ a b Martineau, Belinda (2001). First Fruit: The Creation of the Flavr Savr Tomato and the Birth of Biotech Foods. McGraw-Hill. pp. 269. ISBN 978-0071360562. 

^ FDA Consumer Letter (September 1994): First Biotech Tomato Marketed

^ GEO-PIE Project – Cornell University

^ Shaista Naqvi, et al. Transgenic multivitamin corn through biofortification of endosperm with three vitamins representing three distinct metabolic pathways PNAS April 27, 2009.

^ [http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/NPH-1.pdf Richard M. Manshardt H Rainbow Papaya: A High-Quality Hybrid with Genetically Engineered Disease Resistance. Cooperative Extension Service/CTAHR, University of Hawaii at Manoa.]

^ [http://www.foodsafety.gov/~lrd/biotechn.html U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Biotechnology of Food. FDA Backgrounder: May 18, 1994.]

^ Amflora – A star(ch) is born: Amylose and Amylopectin – two sides to one potato.

^ Rapeseed (canola) has been genetically engineered to modify its oil content with a gene encoding a “12:0 thioesterase” (TE) enzyme from the California bay plant (Umbellularia californica) to increase medium length fatty acids, see:

^ GE Enzymes and Microorganisms

^ Need a more specific citation for this data than the ISAAA homepage.

^ Economic Impact of Genetically Modified Cotton in India

^ Comparing the Performance of Official and Unofficial Genetically Modified Cotton in India

^ Genetically Modified Foods and Organisms

^ Genetic Engineering: The Future of Foods?

^ Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. USDA ERS July 14, 2006

^ Press Releases 2008

^ Organic Farming can Feed The World!

^ Trade barriers seen in EU label for bio-engineered ingredients. (Regulatory and Policy Trends). Business and the Environment 13.11 (Nov 2002): p14(1).

^ a b northwestern.edu Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Paper on: “Consumer Protection” Consumer Strategies and the European Market in Genetically Modified Foods Quote: The recent Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) Statement on the WTO decision makes this clear: “clearly consumers’ preference for non-GM food is the true engine of the market collapse for American crops.” and For instance, Evenson notes that the politicization of GMOs is not merely a question of labeling as information, but unlabeled GM products as catalysts in the “globalization backlash.”

^ a b CBC Identifying genetically modified products. Quote: Yet as seen in this report from CBC’s Marketplace, no such labeling law exists in Canada despite numerous surveys indicating up to 90 per cent of Canadians want mandatory labeling of GM food. Canada’s leading national consumer group does not support mandatory labeling. It appeared to reverse its stance on December 3, 2003: http://www.consumer.ca/1626

^

^ Raney, Terri, and Prahbu Pingali. “Sowing A Gene Revolution.” Scientific American September 2007. 11 September 2008 < http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=sowing-a-gene-revolution>.

^ Lappe FM, Collins J, Rosset P, and Esparza LFrances Moore Lapp ; Joseph Collins; Peter Rosset. With Luis Esparza. (1998). World Hunger: Twelve Myths. Grove Press. pp. 224. ISBN 978-0802135919. 

^ Boucher Dedited by Douglas H. Boucher. (1999). The Paradox of Plenty: Hunger in a Bountiful World. Food First. pp. 342. ISBN 978-0935028713. 

^ Valley, Paul. Strange fruit: Could genetically modified foods offer a solution to the world’s food crisis? The Independent, 18 April 2009.

^ http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/can-biotech-food-cure-world-hunger/#paul Put Aside Prejudices

^ http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/can-biotech-food-cure-world-hunger/#vandana The Failure of Gene Altered Crops]

^ http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/26/can-biotech-food-cure-world-hunger/#per A green Revolution Done Right

^ http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/ US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S. July 2, 2008

^ Economic Impact of Transgenic Crops in Developing Countries

^ Zambia Allows Its People To Eat

^ The Peninsula On-line: Qatar’s leading English Daily

^ World Environment News – Planet Ark

^ Venezuela: Chavez Dumps Monsanto – Social and Economic Policy – Global Policy Forum

^ Home

^ Agriculture Department Probes Rice Flap: NPR

^ “India says no to first GM food crop”, Agence France-Presse (AFP) (New Delhi), 9 February 2010, http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hx8gKVOxrM8-7Pkj6nWSsPwbXBIw 

^ United States General Accounting Office, Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Risk Management, Research, and Specialty Crops, Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives. Information on Prices of Genetically Modified Seeds in the United States and Argentina. January 2000

^ a b Munzer, Stephen R. (2006). Plants, Torts, and Intellectual Property. Oxford University Press. pp. 130. 

^ a b Federal court of Canada. Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser Date: 20010329 Docket: T-1593-98 Retrieved 26 March 2006.

^ Schubert, Robert: “Schmeiser Wants to Take It to The Supreme Court”, CropChoice News, September 9, 2002

^ Kumar, G. B. Sunil; T. R. Ganapathi, C. J. Revathi, L. Srinivas and V. A. Bapat (October 2005). “Expression of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic banana plants”. Planta 222: 484493. doi:10.1007/s00425-005-1556-y. http://www.springerlink.com/content/j28573pu42212114/. 

^ van Beilen, Jan B.; Yves Poirier (May 2008). “Harnessing plant biomass for biofuels and biomaterials:Production of renewable polymers from crop plants”. The Plant Journal 54 (4): 684701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03431.x. 

^ Proteomic profiling and unintended effects in genetically modified crops, Sirpa O. Krenlampi and Satu J. Lehesranta 2006

^ Hierarchical metabolomics demonstrates substantial compositional similarity between genetically modified and conventional potato crops, G S Catchpole and others PNAS October 4, 2005 vol. 102 no. 40 14458-14462

^ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d02566.pdf US GAO. “Genetically Modified Foods: Experts View Regimen of Safety Tests as Adequate, but FDA’s Evaluation Process Could Be Enhanced.” GAO-02-566 Genetically Modified Foods,

^ Key S, Ma JK, Drake PM (June 2008). “Genetically modified plants and human health”. J R Soc Med 101 (6): 2908. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2008.070372. PMID 18515776. http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/content/full/101/6/290. 

^ Peer Reviewed Publications on the Safety of GM Foods. AgBioWorld.

^ Organic Consumers Association

^ True Food Now!

^ James Randerson interviews biologist Arpad Pusztai | Education | The Guardian

^ Ewen SW, Pusztai A (October 1999). “Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine”. Lancet 354 (9187): 13534. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05860-7. PMID 10533866. 

^ Martin Enserink The Lancet Scolded Over Pusztai Paper Science 22 October 1999: Vol. 286. no. 5440, p. 656 DOI 10.1126/science.286.5440.656a

^ Hammond B, Lemen J, Dudek R, et al. (February 2006). “Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from corn rootworm-protected corn”. Food Chem. Toxicol. 44 (2): 14760. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2005.06.008. PMID 16084637. 

^ Hammond B, Dudek R, Lemen J, Nemeth M (June 2004). “Results of a 13 week safety assurance study with rats fed grain from glyphosate tolerant corn”. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (6): 100314. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.013. PMID 15110110. 

^ Hammond BG, Dudek R, Lemen JK, Nemeth MA (July 2006). “Results of a 90-day safety assurance study with rats fed grain from corn borer-protected corn”. Food Chem. Toxicol. 44 (7): 10929. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2006.01.003. PMID 16487643. 

^ Spiroux de Vendmois, et al, “A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health” Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5:706-726 Ivyspring International Publisher

^ Doull J, Gaylor D, Greim HA, Lovell DP, Lynch B, Munro IC (November 2007). “Report of an Expert Panel on the reanalysis by of a 90-day study conducted by Monsanto in support of the safety of a genetically modified corn variety (MON 863)”. Food Chem. Toxicol. 45 (11): 207385. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2007.08.033. PMID 17900781. http://150.161.28.147/homepage/professores/ppa/biolmol/stacking/Doull_et_al-2007.pdf. 

^ Netherwood et al., “Assessing the survival of transgenic planic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,” Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004):2.

^ Smith, Jeffrey. Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, p.130, 2007

^ http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/17450390512331342368 “Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants” Prof. Dr Gerhard Flachowsky; Andrew Chesson; Karen Aulrich

^ Julie A. Nordlee, “Identification of Brazil-Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soybeans,” New England Journal of Medicine, 334 (1996):688-692.

^ Streit, L.G., L.R. Beach, J.C. Register, III, R. Jung, and W.R. Fehr. 2001. Association of the Brazil nut protein gene and Kunitz trypsin inhibitor alleles with soybean protease inhibitor activity and agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 41:17571760.

External links

Cons and Pros of GM food.

http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/gmfood.shtml

Wikibooks has a book on the topic of

Genes, Technology and Policy

Resolution To Label GMO Food Resolution to secure mandatory labeling of GMO food.

Website Citizens To Label GMO Food Information on GMO food labeling.

FAO Agriculture Department and its SOFA report on Agricultural Biotechnology addressing GM food safety

GMO Compass Information on the use of genetic engineering in the agri-food industry. Authorization database with all GM plants in the EU.

GMO Safety Information about research projects on the biological safety of genetically modified plants.

Approved GM crop database

New Scientist article on GMO foods

The FDA List of Completed Consultations on Bioengineered Foods

Coextra research project on coexistence and tracebility of GM and non-GM supply chains

STEPS Centre Biotechnology Research Archive

Controlling Our Food a documentary film by Marie-Monique Robin

Suggested Reading

Mark Pollack & Gregory Shaffer, When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods (Oxford University Press 2009).

Mendel in the Kitchen, by Nina Fedoroff and Nancy Marie Brown

The environmental food crisis A study done by the UN on feeding the world population (2009)

Tomorrow’s Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food, Ronald and Adamchak (2008) ISBN 978-0195301755

Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Food Security in Southern Africa Edited by Steven Were Omamo and Klaus von Grebmer (2005) (Brief and Book available)

Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods by Jeffrey M. Smith.

Beth H. Harrison (2007) Shedding Light on Genetically Engineered Food: What You Don’t Know About the Food You’re Eating and What You Can Do to Protect Yourself

World Hunger by Brian Kenneth Swain is a new fiction book concerning the topic of genetically-modified food and some potential consequences on society. ISBN 978-0595686254

McHughen, A. Pandora’s Picnic Basket: The Potential and Hazards of Genetically Modified Foods, Oxford University Press, 2000

Tokar, B.(ed.) Redesigning Life? Zed Books, 2001.

Let Them Eat Precaution. How Politics Is Undermining the Genetic Revolution in Agriculture. By Byrne, J., Conko, G., Entine, J., Gilland, T., Hoban, T. H., Moore, P., Natsios, A. S, Newell-McGloughlin, M., Paarlberg, R. L., Prakash, C. S., Tucker Foreman, C., Edited by Jon Entine AEI Press (Washington) 2006. Facets of the GM crop debate not covered by antagonists to the technology.

Genetics by Nina V. Fedoroff and Nancy Marie Brown

Helena Norberg-Hodge, “The Pressure to Modernize and Globalize”, in The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local 45 (J. Mander & E. Goldsmith eds., 1996)

Ellen Ruppel Shell, New World Syndrome, ATLANTIC MONTHLY, June 2001

Vandana Shiva, A World View of Abundance, ORION, Summer 2000

Eric Schlosser, Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All American Meal (2001)

Michael Pollan, The Futures of Food: The Industry Has Found a Way to Co-opt the Threat from Organics and low Food. Remember the Meal in a Pill?, NY TIMES MAG., Sun., May 4, 2003, at sec. 6, p. 63

Matt Lee and Ted Lee, The Next Big Flavor: Searching For the Taste of Tomorrow, id. at 66

Amanda Hesser, Vintage Cuts, id. at 72

Danylo Hawaleshka with Brian Bethune and Sue Ferguson, Tainted Food, (Kraft to develop nanoparticles that can change food color, flavor, and nutrient value to suit a person health or palate)

Gary Ruskin, The Fast Food Trap: How Commercialism Creates Overweight Children, Mothering Mazagine, Nov./December 2003

Kate Zernike, Is Obesity the Responsibility of the Body Politic?, NY TIMES, Sun., November 9, 2003, at sec. 4, p. 3

Carl Hulse, Vote in House Bars Some Suits Citing Obesity, NY TIMES, Thurs., March 11, 2004, at sec. A., p. 1

Garcia, Deborah Koons (Director). 2004. The Future of Food. film.

v  d  e

Consumer Food Safety

Adulterants/Food contaminants

Formaldehyde  Melamine  3-MCPD  Cyanide  Lead poisoning  Mercury in fish  Sudan red dye  Aldicarb

Toxins/Poisons

Mycotoxins  Shellfish poisoning  Arsenic contamination of groundwater  Aflatoxin  Benzene in soft drinks  Bisphenol A

Microorganisms

Campylobacter jejuni  Escherichia coli O157:H7  Salmonella  Listeria  Botulism  Clostridium perfringens  Hepatitis A  Hepatitis E  Rotavirus  Norovirus

Pesticides Overuse/Residues

Lindane  DDT, Malathion, Chlorpyrifos, Methamidophos

Preservatives

Benzoic acid  sodium benzoate  EDTA

Sweeteners

Cyclamate  Aspartame controversy  Saccharin  Sucralose  acesulfame potassium  high fructose corn syrup  sorbitol

Food Scares

ICA meat repackaging controversy  Bradford sweets poisoning  Minamata disease  Chilean grape scare  2005 Indonesia food scare  2008 Chinese milk scandal   2007 Vietnam food scare   2008 Canadian listeriosis outbreak  2008 United States salmonellosis outbreak  2006 North American E. coli outbreak  Irish pork crisis of 2008  Toxic oil syndrome  List of foodborne illness outbreaks  List of food contamination incidents

Regulatory/Watchdog

International Food Safety Network  Food and Drug Administration  E number  Acceptable daily intake  Food Standards Agency  Quality Assurance International  Food Safety Act 1990  Pure Food and Drug Act  European Food Safety Authority  List of food safety organisations  Food law  Early history of food regulation in the United States  Food labeling regulations

Food Processing

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  Food irradiation  Nitrosamines  Trans fat  Acrylamide  Shortening  Hydrolyzed vegetable protein  Modified starch  4-Hydroxynonenal  Heterocyclic amines  Creutzfeldtakob disease

Misc

Foodborne illness  Food Preservation  Food safety in the People’s Republic of China   Curing (food preservation)  Food quality  Food marketing  Genetically modified food  Food safety (science)  Food politics

Categories: Food industry | Genetically modified organisms in agriculture | Genetic engineering | Environmental issuesHidden categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from January 2010 | Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009